 |
|
Joseph Haydn (1732–1809)
|
Joseph Haydn
Austrian composer (b. 31 March 1732 at Rohrau; d. 31 May 1809 in
Vienna), born Franz Joseph
Haydn.
As Herman Laroche emphasized in the
Foreword to his 1898 edition of his late friend's music review articles,
Haydn was not one of Tchaikovsky's favourite composers. Nevertheless, Laroche
added, it was characteristic
of Tchaikovsky's firm conviction about the importance of German classical music
that he should have recommended the board of directors of the Russian Musical
Society to feature as many of Haydn's string quartets as possible in the concerts
it organized. Tchaikovsky was certainly familiar with a fair amount of Haydn's
prolific output, as during his years at the
Saint Petersburg Conservatory
he had played the flute in the student orchestra, and Haydn symphonies were
frequently on the repertoire. Even in later years he would sometimes play through
Haydn's works on the piano. However, despite all the respect he felt for Haydn's
vital contribution to the development of classical music and his hard-working
ethos, there was not enough warmth and content in his works, as Tchaikovsky
saw it (see the references listed below). In the obituary which
Laroche published shortly after Tchaikovsky's
death, he noted how, notwithstanding his love of the eighteenth century
in general, "[Tchaikovsky's] archaic tastes did not extend to the music of that
age. With the exception of Mozart, whom he
had loved ever since his youth and to whom he remained faithful right to the
very end, and quite possibly Haydn, too, who interested him in patches, he was
indifferent to all music before Beethoven…"
[1] . Taking
Beethoven as his bench-mark
(as Tchaikovsky frequently did), there was not so much in "good old" Haydn's
music that could stand such a comparison.
Tchaikovsky's arrangements of works by Joseph Haydn:
-
Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser, TH 185
(1874) — arrangement of the Austrian National Anthem, based on
Haydn's.song Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser (1797).
Tchaikovsky's general reflections on Joseph Haydn:
(bold references indicate particularly detailed or interesting references)
In Tchaikovsky's music review articles:
- TH 266 — Tchaikovsky
calls Haydn the "father of all contemporary music", emphasizes how he had
devoted his finest energies to chamber music, and after hearing a "delightfully
naïve and cheerful" string quartet by him exhorts the Russian Musical Society
to feature as many of Haydn's quartets as possible in its concert programmes.
- TH 270 — lists Haydn
together with Bach,
Mozart, Beethoven,
Mendelssohn,
Schumann, and
Glinka as examples of the type of "hard-working
artist" who concentrated on his music rather than seeking to draw attention
to himself by championing various "theories" or causes (as in the case of
Wagner).
- TH 276 — discusses
the "invaluable historical services" which "the jovial old Haydn" had rendered
for the development of symphonic and chamber music, paving the way for
Mozart and
Beethoven; but points out the
"slickness and elegant coldness" of his music, which never moved one as profoundly
as that of the following generations of composers. Nevertheless Tchaikovsky
insists that Haydn's "nice and pretty" music ought to be played more often
in the Russian Musical Society concerts.
- TH 298 — referring to
an unspecified symphony in G major by Haydn, Tchaikovsky calls it "an ancient
but still splendid piece of music!"
In Tchaikovsky's letters:
- Letter 3675 to Grand Duke Konstantin
Konstantinovich, 21 September/3 October 1888, in which Tchaikovsky discusses,
amongst other things, how it was quite impossible to accuse
Beethoven of prolixity,
even in his late string quartets:
"Just ask some people who are particularly familiar with these quartets
(for example, the members of some regularly playing chamber music ensemble)
whether they can find anything superfluous in [Beethoven's] C♯ minor quartet [Op.131]. Almost certainly any
such musician, unless he happened to be an old man who was brought up on
Haydn, would be horrified if you suggested that he should cut or leave out
anything […] Yes, it goes without saying that the classical beauty of the
masters who came before Beethoven and their skill in the art of sich
beschränken zu wissen ["knowing how to restrain oneself"'] are of a
tremendous value. But it must also be said that Haydn had no need to restrain
himself because God knows! he really didn't have that much material anyway…"
- Letter 4149 to Modest Tchaikovsky,
15/27 June 1890:
"It's costing me an incredible effort to write this [the string sextet
Souvenir de Florence]; what's
so difficult for me is not the lack of ideas but the novelty of the form.
It requires six independent yet at the same time homogenous voices. This
is incredibly difficult. Haydn was never able to surmount this difficulty
and invariably wrote all his chamber music for string quartet"
In Tchaikovsky's diaries:
- Diary entry for 20 September/2 October 1886, in which Tchaikovsky reflects
mainly on his contrasting feelings for Mozart
and Beethoven, but mentions Mozart's predecessors
at the end:
"… I like a thing or two in Haydn's music. However, all these four big
shots [Bach, Handel,
Gluck, and Haydn] are amalgamated in
Mozart. He that knows
Mozart knows everything that was good
about these four, since, being the greatest and most powerful of musical
Creators, he [Mozart] did not
disdain to take them under his wing, thereby saving them from oblivion.
They are like rays which are submerged in the sun that
Mozart is" [2]
Tchaikovsky's views on specific works by Joseph Haydn:
In Tchaikovsky's music review articles:
- Symphony No. 103 in E♭, Hob. I/103 (1795),
"The Drumroll" — TH 276
| See also:
Please note that we are not
responsible for the content of other internet sites
|
Notes:
- Quoted in
Воспоминания о П. И. Чайковском (1980), p.
44 [back]
- Quoted here from
Дни и годы П. И. Чайковского (1940),
p. 386 [back]
|